‍A Step-by-Step Leap in AI Reasoning

‍

When OpenAI introduced its o1 reasoning model in late 2024, it marked a significant shift from traditional large language models. Positioned as a true reasoning agent, o1 was designed to think through problems much like a human. OpenAI’s own benchmarks showed the model solving 83% of questions on a qualifying exam for the International Mathematics Olympiad, compared to GPT-4o’s 13% (Promptlayer). In coding challenges, o1 reached the 89th percentile on Codeforces. This leap was driven by chain-of-thought reasoning, where the model produces a long internal thought process before answering, mirroring how people tackle complex problems. However, alongside its brilliance, o1 occasionally took illogical paths or invented facts.

‍

‍

The Innovation Behind o1

Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting encourages large language models to break tasks into intermediate steps, promoting coherence and transparency. By training on multi-step examples and even simulated “agentic debates,” o1 learned to plan its own reasoning path rather than simply predicting the next most likely word. This approach enabled it to handle PhD-level math and science problems, improving both accuracy and interpretability. Yet, the method comes at a cost: breaking tasks into smaller steps demands more computational power and relies heavily on well-crafted, high-quality prompts.

‍

‍

From Reasoning to Agentic Workflows

The structured thinking in o1 opened the door to agentic AI workflows. In 2025, tools like LangChain, Groq, and custom agents have leveraged CoT to coordinate multi-step tasks such as summarizing documents, planning marketing strategies, and debugging code. According to a Stanford HAI survey, 78% of organizations now use some form of AI—up from 55% in 2023. Gartner predicts that by 2028, 15% of daily work decisions will be made autonomously by agentic AI, signaling a shift toward reasoning agents as integral directors of workflows.

‍

‍

Adoption and Returns

Agentic AI has moved well beyond experimentation. Grand View Research projects the global AI agents market to grow from US$5.4 billion in 2024 to US$50.3 billion by 2030, representing a 45.8% compound annual growth rate. Data from Master of Code indicates that organizations using advanced agents see a 128% higher ROI on customer experience initiatives compared with those sticking to traditional approaches. Still, caution remains—an NTT DATA survey found that 75% of executives fear their AI ambitions may conflict with sustainability goals, highlighting the ethical and environmental challenges of scaling autonomous systems.

‍

‍

The Double-Edged Nature of Reasoning

More reasoning does not always translate to more accuracy. Testing by SmythOS found that on the PersonQA benchmark, o1 provided incorrect answers 16% of the time, and its successors hallucinated even more. On the SimpleQA benchmark, o1 fabricated facts in 44% of answers. Researchers suggest that long reasoning chains can amplify small initial errors, leading to confident yet false conclusions. As businesses integrate these agents into workflows, ensuring reliability and establishing guardrails becomes critical.

‍

‍

What’s Next for 2025 Workflows

Agentic AI is poised to transform the way work gets done, but its success depends on balancing automation with human oversight. Gartner’s forecast of 15% autonomous decision-making by 2028 implies that the majority of decisions will still involve people. With organizations already deploying agents in areas such as customer service, logistics, and software development, the coming years will test our ability to harness the power of chain-of-thought reasoning while mitigating hallucinations. Early adopters are enjoying significant efficiency gains and ROI, but ethical considerations and sustainability concerns remain at the forefront.

‍